INSTRUCCIÓN ORTOPÉDICA DE POSGRADO

Puntajes II

Ernesto Bersusky,^* Ignacio Arzac Ulla,^** Lidia G. Loterzo,^# Guillermo Ricciardi,^## Gerardo Zanotti,^ǂ Juan Martín Patiño^ǂǂ

^*Hospital de Pediatría “Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan”, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

^**BR Traumatología, Azul, Buenos Aires, Argentina

^#Hospital Central de San Isidro “Dr. Melchor Á. Posse”, Buenos Aires, Argentina

^##Hospital General de Agudos “Dr. Teodoro Álvarez”, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina ^ǂHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

^ǂǂHospital Militar Central “Cirujano Mayor Dr. Cosme Argerich”, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina

RESUMEN

El Comité Editorial quiere brindar a sus lectores una actualización de las escalas de uso corriente. El empleo de tablas y escalas es una práctica muy extendida en la Ortopedia y Traumatología. La medición y la cuantificación de los aspectos clínicos, funcionales y radiográficos se convirtieron en una herramienta imprescindible para la toma de decisiones en diferentes aspectos de la actividad asistencial. Llevamos a cabo una revisión de las escalas más utilizadas, definiendo su uso e incluyendo bibliografía original y actualizada.

Palabras clave: Escalas; puntajes; tablas; actualización.

Nivel de Evidencia: V

Scores II

ABSTRACT

The Editorial Committee wants to provide its readers with an update on the commonly used scales. The use of tables and scales is a widespread practice in Orthopedics and Traumatology. The measurement and quantification of clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects have become essential tools for decision-making in different aspects of healthcare activity. We carried out a review of the most used scales, defining their use and including original and updated literature.

Key words: Scales; scores; tables; update.

Level of Evidence: V

Introducción

Llevamos a cabo una revisión de las escalas más utilizadas, definiendo su uso e incluyendo bibliografía original y actualizada; en esta oportunidad, nos ocupa la sección de puntajes en mano.

Bibliografía sugerida

- Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts?: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14(2):128-42. PMID: 11382253

- http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/available-translations

- Hosokawa T, Tajika T, Suto M, Chikuda H. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores in 961 Japanese volunteers. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2020;28(3):2309499020970656. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020970656

- Hillesund S, Fromreide I, Foss OA, Finsen V. The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2018;52(5):294-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938

- Smith-Forbes V, Howell DM, Willoughby J, Pitts DG, Uhl TL. A retrospective cohort study of QuickDASH scores for three hand therapy acute upper limb conditions. Mil Med 2018;183(suppl_1):522-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usx199

- Barai A, Lambie B, Cosgrave C, Baxter J. Management of distal radius fractures in the emergency department: A long-term functional outcome measure study with the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Emerg Med Australas 2018;30(4):530-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12946

- Wormdal AH, Tallaksen SH, Hagen Ø, Foss OA, Finsen V. Remembered preoperative Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017;42(1):78-83. https://doi.org/1177/1753193416665299

Bibliografía sugerida

- Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:S174-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20630

- Hong SW, Gong HS, Park JW, Roh YH, Baek GH. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Korean version of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Korean Med Sci 2018;33(40):e249. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e249

Bibliografía sugerida

- Campbell DA, Kay SP. The Hand Injury Severity Scoring System. J Hand Surg Br 1996;21(3):295-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-7681(05)80187-1

- Bhat AK, Acharya AM, Mishra D. Correlation of HISS and Strickland Score with the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in hand injuries. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020;11(4):620-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.026

- Çapkın S, Cavit A, Yılmaz K, Erdoğan E, Kaleli T. Associations between initial injury severity in acute hand, wrist or forearm injuries and disability ratings and time to return to work. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2020;26(3):453-61. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2019.40524

- Tezel N, Can A. The association between injury severity and psychological morbidity, hand function, and return to work in traumatic hand injury with major nerve involvement: A one-year follow-up study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2020;26(6):905-10. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.39472

Bibliografía sugerida

- Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75(11):1585-92. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002

- de Carvalho Leite JC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-78

- Oteo-Álvaro Á, Marín MT, Matas JA, Vaquero J. Validación al castellano de la escala Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Med Clin (Barc) 2016;146(6):247-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2015.10.013

- Andani Cervera J, Balbastre Tejedor M, Gómez Pajares F, Garrido Lahiguera R, López Ferreres A.. Valoración del cuestionario de BOSTON como screening en patología laboral por síndrome del tú́nel carpiano. Rev Asoc Esp Espec Med Trab [online]. 2017;26(1):31-8. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S113262552017000100004#:~:text=El%20cuestionario%20de%20Boston%20incluye,s%C3%ADndrome%20del%20t%C3%BAnel%20carpiano%20laboral

ORCID de E. Bersusky: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3121-9326

ORCID de G. Zanotti: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-4832

ORCID de L. G. Loterzo: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5465-1747

ORCID de J. M. Patiño: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9036-0442

ORCID de G. Ricciardi: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6959-9301

Dr. IGNACIO ARZAC ULLA • ignacioarzac@hotmail.com • https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5038-7720

Cómo citar este artículo: Bersusky E, Arzac Ulla I, Loterzo LG, Ricciardi G, Zanotti G, Patiño JM. Puntajes II. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2022;87(3):447-453. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.3.1583

Información del artículo

Identificación: https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.3.1583

Fecha de publicación: Junio, 2022

Conflicto de intereses: Los autores no declaran conflictos de intereses.

Licencia: Este artículo está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional. (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0)