Participation of Women at the Societal and Institutional Level in the Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 17, 2023
Keywords:
Women in Orthopedics and Traumatology, female representation, diversity in Orthopedics and Traumatology
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the representation of women at the societal level within the Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología (AAOT).
Materials and Methods: An observational and descriptive study was conducted analyzing data obtained from the period between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The proportion of women members of the AAOT, as well as their participation at the institutional, hierarchical, and academic levels, was assessed.
Results: Women represent 10.6% of all AAOT members. Twelve women actively participate in the different Committees of the Association, which represents 16% of the total number of members. During the study period, 2.8% of the positions on the Board of Directors were held by women. In the history of the AAOT, only one woman has served as President. In 2019, women made up 6.9% of teachers who taught the Biannual Official National Orthopedics and Traumatology Certification Course.
Conclusion: Women represent 10.6% of AAOT members. Knowing their situation within the AAOT allows laying the foundations to implement measures aimed at improving equity in Orthopedics and Traumatology.
Materials and Methods: An observational and descriptive study was conducted analyzing data obtained from the period between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The proportion of women members of the AAOT, as well as their participation at the institutional, hierarchical, and academic levels, was assessed.
Results: Women represent 10.6% of all AAOT members. Twelve women actively participate in the different Committees of the Association, which represents 16% of the total number of members. During the study period, 2.8% of the positions on the Board of Directors were held by women. In the history of the AAOT, only one woman has served as President. In 2019, women made up 6.9% of teachers who taught the Biannual Official National Orthopedics and Traumatology Certification Course.
Conclusion: Women represent 10.6% of AAOT members. Knowing their situation within the AAOT allows laying the foundations to implement measures aimed at improving equity in Orthopedics and Traumatology.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Bruchmann, M. G., Barcia, S. A., Dello Russo, B., Vivas, M., Aquino, G., & Santini Araujo, M. G. (2023). Participation of Women at the Societal and Institutional Level in the Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 88(3), 362-368. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2023.88.3.1650
Issue
Section
Artículo Especial
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
References
1. Sistema de Información Permanente (SIP) Censo de estudiantes, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Coordinación
General de Planificación y Estrategia Institucional 2011. Disponible en: http://www.uba.ar/institucional/censos/Estudiantes2011/estudiantes2011.pdf [Consulta: 4 de mayo, 2019]
2. Eiguchi K. La feminización de la Medicina. Rev Argent Salud Pública 2017;8(30):6-7. Disponible en:
http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853 810X2017000100001#:~:text=El%20concepto%20de%20%22feminizaci%C3%B3n%20de,ejercicio%20de%20la%20profesi%C3%B3n%20m%C3%A9dica
3. Poon S, Kiridly D, Mutawakkil M. Current trends in sex, race, and ethnic diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery
Residency. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27(16):e725-e733. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00131
4. Whitaker J, Hartley B, Zamora R, Duvall D, Wolf V. Residency selection preferences and Orthopaedic career
perceptions: A notable mismatch. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478(7):1515-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001161
5. Van Heest A. Gender diversity in orthopedic surgery: We all know it’s lacking, but why? Iowa Orthop J
2020;40(1):1-4. PMID: 32742201
6. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book, Academic Year 2019-2020.
Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2020.
7. Van Heest AE, Fishman F, Agel J. A 5-year update on the uneven distribution of women in Orthopaedic Surgery
Residency Training Programs in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98(15):e64. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00962
8. Dineen HA, Patterson JMM, Eskildsen SM, Gan ZS, Li Q, Patterson BC, et al. Gender preferences of patients when selecting orthopaedic providers. Iowa Orthop J 2019;39(1):203-10. PMID: 31413695
9. Green JA, Chye VPC, Hiemstra LA, Fellander-Tsai L, Incoll I, Weber C, et al. Diversity: women in Orthopaedic
Surgery- a perspective from the International Orthopaedic Diversity Alliance. JTO 2020;8(1):44-51. Disponible en:
https://www.boa.ac.uk/static/a24ead71-ad82-4e23-98efacf343cbd015/Diversity-women-in-orthopaedic-surgery-IODAperspectiveupdated-110320.pdf
10. Tolo VT. Leadership, diversity are challenges for future: New AAOS President sets priorities. AAOS Bull 2002;50. Disponible en: http:// www2.aaos.org/bulletin/apr02/acdnws7.12.htm [Consulta: 27 de noviembre, 2018]
11. Cafruni VM, Cabas Geat A, Labella JF, Farfalli GL, Ayerza MA, Aponte Tinao LA, et al. Las mujeres y la residencia
de ortopedia y traumatología en Argentina: ¿Qué proporción representan hoy? Rev Fac Cs Med Cba 2022;79(1):1-4. Disponible en: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/28184/37021#:~:text=Actual%20Presidente%20 de%20la%20Asociaci%C3%B3n,de%20los%20estudiantes%20son%20mujeres
12. Texto Ordenado del Estatuto Social de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología. 2018. Disponible en: https://aaot.org.ar/download/estatuto-social/
13. Hiemstra LA, Wittman T, Mulpuri K, Vezina C, Kerslake S. Dissecting disparity: improvements towards gender
parity in leadership and on the podium within the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Journal of ISAKOS 2019;4:227-32. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2019-000290
14. Mujeres en el Sistema Universitario Argentino. Departamento de Formación Universitaria (DIU), Secretaría de
Políticas Universitarias, Ministerio de Educación Argentina, Estadísticas 2019-2020. Disponible en:
http://bancos.salud.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2021-05/Mujeres-en-el-Sistema-Universitario-Argentino-19-20.pdf
15. Brown MA, Erdman MK, Munger AM, Miller AN. Despite growing number of women surgeons, authorship gender disparity in orthopaedic literature persists over 30 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478(7):1542-52.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000849
16. Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2017;359:j4366. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4366
17. Pories SE, Turner PL, Greenberg CC, Babu MA, Parangi S. Leadership in American Surgery: Women are rising to the top. Ann Surg 2019;269(2):199-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002978
18. Pagotto VL. Enfoque de género en las residencias médicas [tesis de maestría]. Buenos Aires: Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano; 2017:70. Disponible en: http://trovare.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/descargas/tesisytr/20180824150835/tesis-pagotto.pdf
19. Bernstein J, Dicaprio MR, Mehta S. The relationship between required medical school instruction in
musculoskeletal medicine and application rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(10):2335-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200410000-00031
20. Baldwin K, Namdari S, Bowers A, Keenan MA, Levin LS, Ahn J. Factors affecting interest in orthopedics among
female medical students: a prospective analysis. Orthopedics 2011;34(12):e919-32. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20111021-17
21. Saxena S, Cannada LK, Weiss JM. Does the proportion of women in orthopaedic leadership roles reflect the gender composition of specialty societies? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478(7):1572-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000823
22. Mangurian C, Linos E, Sarkar U, Rodriguez C, Jagsi R. What’s holding women in medicine back from leadership. Harv Bus Rev 2018. Disponible en: https://hbr.org/2018/06/whats-holding-women-in-medicine-back-from-leadership [Consulta: 19 de junio, 2018]
23. Munger AM, Heckmann N, McKnight B, Dusch MN, Hatch GF 3rd, Omid R. Revisiting the gender gap in
Orthopaedic Surgery: Investigating the relationship between Orthopaedic Surgery Female Faculty and Female
Residency Applicants. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27(8):295-300. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00686
24. Lin MP, Lall MD, Samuels-Kalow M, Das D, Linden JA, Perman S, et al. Impact of a women-focused professional
organization on academic retention and advancement: Perceptions from a qualitative study. Acad Emerg Med
2019;26(3):303-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13699
25. Mulcahey MK, Waterman BR, Hart R, Daniels AH. The role of mentoring in the development of successful
orthopaedic surgeons. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018;26(13):463-71. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00665
General de Planificación y Estrategia Institucional 2011. Disponible en: http://www.uba.ar/institucional/censos/Estudiantes2011/estudiantes2011.pdf [Consulta: 4 de mayo, 2019]
2. Eiguchi K. La feminización de la Medicina. Rev Argent Salud Pública 2017;8(30):6-7. Disponible en:
http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853 810X2017000100001#:~:text=El%20concepto%20de%20%22feminizaci%C3%B3n%20de,ejercicio%20de%20la%20profesi%C3%B3n%20m%C3%A9dica
3. Poon S, Kiridly D, Mutawakkil M. Current trends in sex, race, and ethnic diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery
Residency. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27(16):e725-e733. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00131
4. Whitaker J, Hartley B, Zamora R, Duvall D, Wolf V. Residency selection preferences and Orthopaedic career
perceptions: A notable mismatch. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478(7):1515-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001161
5. Van Heest A. Gender diversity in orthopedic surgery: We all know it’s lacking, but why? Iowa Orthop J
2020;40(1):1-4. PMID: 32742201
6. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Data Resource Book, Academic Year 2019-2020.
Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2020.
7. Van Heest AE, Fishman F, Agel J. A 5-year update on the uneven distribution of women in Orthopaedic Surgery
Residency Training Programs in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98(15):e64. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00962
8. Dineen HA, Patterson JMM, Eskildsen SM, Gan ZS, Li Q, Patterson BC, et al. Gender preferences of patients when selecting orthopaedic providers. Iowa Orthop J 2019;39(1):203-10. PMID: 31413695
9. Green JA, Chye VPC, Hiemstra LA, Fellander-Tsai L, Incoll I, Weber C, et al. Diversity: women in Orthopaedic
Surgery- a perspective from the International Orthopaedic Diversity Alliance. JTO 2020;8(1):44-51. Disponible en:
https://www.boa.ac.uk/static/a24ead71-ad82-4e23-98efacf343cbd015/Diversity-women-in-orthopaedic-surgery-IODAperspectiveupdated-110320.pdf
10. Tolo VT. Leadership, diversity are challenges for future: New AAOS President sets priorities. AAOS Bull 2002;50. Disponible en: http:// www2.aaos.org/bulletin/apr02/acdnws7.12.htm [Consulta: 27 de noviembre, 2018]
11. Cafruni VM, Cabas Geat A, Labella JF, Farfalli GL, Ayerza MA, Aponte Tinao LA, et al. Las mujeres y la residencia
de ortopedia y traumatología en Argentina: ¿Qué proporción representan hoy? Rev Fac Cs Med Cba 2022;79(1):1-4. Disponible en: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/28184/37021#:~:text=Actual%20Presidente%20 de%20la%20Asociaci%C3%B3n,de%20los%20estudiantes%20son%20mujeres
12. Texto Ordenado del Estatuto Social de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología. 2018. Disponible en: https://aaot.org.ar/download/estatuto-social/
13. Hiemstra LA, Wittman T, Mulpuri K, Vezina C, Kerslake S. Dissecting disparity: improvements towards gender
parity in leadership and on the podium within the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Journal of ISAKOS 2019;4:227-32. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2019-000290
14. Mujeres en el Sistema Universitario Argentino. Departamento de Formación Universitaria (DIU), Secretaría de
Políticas Universitarias, Ministerio de Educación Argentina, Estadísticas 2019-2020. Disponible en:
http://bancos.salud.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2021-05/Mujeres-en-el-Sistema-Universitario-Argentino-19-20.pdf
15. Brown MA, Erdman MK, Munger AM, Miller AN. Despite growing number of women surgeons, authorship gender disparity in orthopaedic literature persists over 30 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478(7):1542-52.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000849
16. Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2017;359:j4366. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4366
17. Pories SE, Turner PL, Greenberg CC, Babu MA, Parangi S. Leadership in American Surgery: Women are rising to the top. Ann Surg 2019;269(2):199-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002978
18. Pagotto VL. Enfoque de género en las residencias médicas [tesis de maestría]. Buenos Aires: Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano; 2017:70. Disponible en: http://trovare.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/descargas/tesisytr/20180824150835/tesis-pagotto.pdf
19. Bernstein J, Dicaprio MR, Mehta S. The relationship between required medical school instruction in
musculoskeletal medicine and application rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(10):2335-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200410000-00031
20. Baldwin K, Namdari S, Bowers A, Keenan MA, Levin LS, Ahn J. Factors affecting interest in orthopedics among
female medical students: a prospective analysis. Orthopedics 2011;34(12):e919-32. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20111021-17
21. Saxena S, Cannada LK, Weiss JM. Does the proportion of women in orthopaedic leadership roles reflect the gender composition of specialty societies? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020;478(7):1572-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000823
22. Mangurian C, Linos E, Sarkar U, Rodriguez C, Jagsi R. What’s holding women in medicine back from leadership. Harv Bus Rev 2018. Disponible en: https://hbr.org/2018/06/whats-holding-women-in-medicine-back-from-leadership [Consulta: 19 de junio, 2018]
23. Munger AM, Heckmann N, McKnight B, Dusch MN, Hatch GF 3rd, Omid R. Revisiting the gender gap in
Orthopaedic Surgery: Investigating the relationship between Orthopaedic Surgery Female Faculty and Female
Residency Applicants. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27(8):295-300. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00686
24. Lin MP, Lall MD, Samuels-Kalow M, Das D, Linden JA, Perman S, et al. Impact of a women-focused professional
organization on academic retention and advancement: Perceptions from a qualitative study. Acad Emerg Med
2019;26(3):303-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13699
25. Mulcahey MK, Waterman BR, Hart R, Daniels AH. The role of mentoring in the development of successful
orthopaedic surgeons. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018;26(13):463-71. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00665