Use of Masquelet Technique for the Reconstruction of Bone Defects in the Ankle. Case Report

  • Fernando Vago Anaya Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8589-7782
  • Juan Ignacio Crosa Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2373-013X
  • Mauro A. Goveo Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4761-6148
  • Emiliano Loncharich Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1106-3544
  • César A. Pesciallo Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4461-8465
Keywords: Bone defect, foot and ankle, distal tibia, Masquelet technique

Abstract

Segmental bone defects in the foot and ankle represent a challenge due to their anatomical characteristics, limited vascularization, and poor muscle coverage. The technique described by Masquelet has shown excellent results for the treatment of segmental bone defects in long bones. However, there are few studies in the literature on its use in the foot and ankle. The induced membrane technique offers a valid treatment alternative to solve bone defects. It allows treatment without the need for complex procedures, such as vascularized bone grafts or distraction osteogenesis, with a high rate of consolidation, preserving the length and function of the limb. Although we cannot prove that this procedure is the most indicated for the treatment of bone defects, we can affirm that all our patients have achieved consolidation, which encourages us to continue performing this same technique

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fernando Vago Anaya, Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Juan Ignacio Crosa, Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Mauro A. Goveo, Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Emiliano Loncharich, Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
César A. Pesciallo, Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Foot and Ankle Sector, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

References

Andrzejowski P, Masquelet A, Giannoudis PV. Induced membrane technique (Masquelet) for bone defects in

the distal tibia, foot, and ankle: Systematic review, case presentations, tips, and techniques. Foot Ankle Clin

;25(4):537-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2020.08.013

Pelissier P, Bollecker V, Martin D, Baudet J. Foot reconstruction with the “bi-Masquelet” procedure. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2002;47(4):304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0294-1260(02)00123-1

Cattaneo R, Catagni M, Johnson EE. The treatment of infected nonunions and segmental defects of the tibia by the methods of Ilizarov. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;(280):143-52. PMID: 1611734

DeCoster TA, Gehlert RJ, Mikola EA, Pirela-Cruz MA. Management of posttraumatic segmental bone defects. J

Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12(1):28-38. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200401000-00005

Obremskey WT, Molina CS, Collinge C, Tornetta P, Sagi C, Schmidt A, et al. Current practice in the management of segmental bone defects among orthopaedic trauma surgeons. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28(8):e203-7.

https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000034

Gaskill TR, Urbaniak JR, Aldridge JM. Free vascularized fibular transfer for femoral head osteonecrosis: donor and graft site morbidity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(8):861-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01105

Myeroff C, Archdeancon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(3): 222-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01513

Masquelet AC, Fitoussi F, Begue T, Muller GP. Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and

spongy autograft. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2000;45(3):346-53. PMID: 10929461

Masquelet A, Kanakaris NK, Obert L, Stafford P, Giannoudis PV. Bone repair using the Masquelet technique. J

Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101(11):1024-36. https;//doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00842

Giannoudis PV, Faour O, Goff T, Kanakaris N, Dimitriou R. Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: tips-tricks and future directions. Injury 2011;42(6):591-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.036

Giannoudis PV, Harwood PJ, Tosounidis T, Kanakaris NK. Restoration of long bone defects treated with the

induced membrane technique: protocol and outcomes. Injury 2016;47(Suppl 6):S53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30840-3

Wong TM, Lau TW, Li X, Fang C, Yeung K, Leung F. Masquelet technique for treatment of posttraumatic bone

defects. Sci World J 2014;2014:710302. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/710302

Mauffrey C, Hake ME, Chadayammuri V, Masquelet AC. Reconstruction of long bone infections using the induced membrane technique: Tips and tricks. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30(6):e188-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000500

Pesciallo C, Garabano G, Montero Vinces A, Gómez DJ, Bidolegui F, Cid Casteulani A. Defectos óseos

segmentarios infectados en huesos largos: tratamiento con técnica de Masquelet. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2019;84(1):15-26. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2019.84.1.853

Taylor BC, French BG, Fowler TT, Russell J, Poka A. Induced membrane technique for reconstruction to manage bone loss. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012;20(3):142-50. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-20-03-142

Klaue K, Knothe U, Masquelet A. Effet biologique des membranes à corps étranger induites in situ sur la

consolidation des greffes d’os spongieux. Rev Chir Orthop Suppl 1995:109-10 (70e réunion annuelle de la

SOFCOT).

Masquelet AC, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am 2010;41(1):27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011

Pelissier P, Masquelet AC, Bareille R, Mathoulin Pelissier S, Amedee J. Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration. J Orthop Res 2004;22(1):73-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00165-7

Largey A, Faline A, Hebrard W, Hamoui M, Canovas F. Management of massive traumatic compound defects of the foot. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009;95(4):301-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.02.005

Mak MF, Stern R, Assal M. Masquelet technique for midfoot reconstruction following osteomyelitis in charcot

diabetic neuropathy: a case report. JBJS Case Connect 2015;5(2):e281-5. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.N.00112

Liu F, Huang RK, Xie M, Pan H, Zhao JJ, Lei B. Use of Masquelet’s technique for treating the first metatarsophalangeal joint in cases of gout combined with a massive bone defect. Foot Ankle Surg 2018;24(2):159-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.01.009

Luo F, Wang X, Wang S, Fu J, Xie Z. Induced membrane technique combined with two stage internal fixation for the treatment of tibial osteomyelitis defects. Injury 2017;48(7):1623-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.052

Pesciallo CA, Garabano G, Dainotto T, Ernst G. Masquelet technique in post-traumatic infected femoral and tibial segmental bone defects. Union and reoperation rates with high proportions (up to 64%) of allograft in the second stage. Injury 2021;52(11):3471-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.08.031

Karger C, Kishi T, Schneider L, Fitoussi F, Masquelet AC. Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98:97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.11.001

Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafts. J Am

Acad Orthop Surg 2003;26:923-4. PMID: 15712985

Pelissier P, Masquelet AC, Lepreux S, Martin D, Baudet J. Behavior of cancellous bone graft placed in induced

membranes. Br J Plast Surg 2002;55:598-600. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2002.3936

Siboni R, Joseph E, Blasco L, Barbe C, Bajolet O, Diallo S, et al. Management of septic non-union of the

tibia by the induced membrane technique. What factors could improve results? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

;104(6):911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.013

Zoller SD, Cao LA, Smith RA, Sheppard W, Lord EL, Hamad CD, et al. Staged reconstruction of diaphyseal

fractures with segmental defects: Surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Injury 2017;48(10):2248-52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.018

Published
2024-04-16
How to Cite
Vago Anaya, F., Crosa, J. I., Goveo, M. A., Loncharich, E., & Pesciallo, C. A. (2024). Use of Masquelet Technique for the Reconstruction of Bone Defects in the Ankle. Case Report. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 89(2), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2024.89.2.1800
Section
Case Presentations