Retrograde Femoral Intramedullary Nail Extraction Techniques. Report of Three Cases

Main Article Content

Jonatan Alejandro Lobo
Sebastián Pereira
Fernando Bidolegui

Abstract

Background: The indication for osteosynthesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail in femur fractures has increased in recent years and with it, the number of complications. Three surgical techniques are described for the management of the proximal fragment of the broken intramedullary osteosynthesis. From March 2001 to January 2019, 321 osteosyntheses with retrograde femoral intramedullary nails were performed at our institution. The implant rupture rate associated with nonunion was 0.9%. Minimally invasivetechniques were performed to remove the implant, preserving the soft tissues. Definitive reosteosynthesis was achieved with the consequent consolidation in an average time of 140 days.
Conclusions: The techniques used were simple, safe, minimally invasive, and reproducible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Lobo, J. A., Pereira, S., & Bidolegui, F. (2021). Retrograde Femoral Intramedullary Nail Extraction Techniques. Report of Three Cases. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 86(3), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2021.86.3.986
Section
Case Presentations
Author Biographies

Jonatan Alejandro Lobo, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Sirio Libanés (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Sirio Libanés (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Sebastián Pereira, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Sirio Libanés (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Sirio Libanés (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Fernando Bidolegui, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Sirio Libanés (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Sirio Libanés (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

References

1. Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five
hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66(4):529-39. PMID: 6707031

2. Pereira S, Lugones A, Vindver GI, Bidolegui FM. Enclavado endomedular retrógrado en fracturas diafisarias de
fémur: indicaciones, técnica y resultados. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2014;79(4):210-17. https://doi.org/10.15417/340

3. Sanders R, Koval KJ, DiPasquale T, Helfet DL, Frankle M. Retrograde reamed femoral nailing. J Orthop Trauma
1993;7(4):293-302. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199308000-00001

4. Janzing HM, Stockman B, Van Damme G, Rommens P, Broos PL. The retrograde intramedullary nail: prospective experience in patients older than sixty-five years. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12(5):330-3.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199806000-00006

5. Benirschke SK, Melder I, Henley MB, Routt ML, Smith DG, Chapman JR, et al. Closed interlocking nailing
of femoral shaft fractures: assessment of technical complications and functional outcomes by comparison of a
prospective database with retrospective review. J Orthop Trauma 1993;7(2):118-22. PMID: 8459295

6. Tornetta P 3rd, Tiburzi D. The treatment of femoral shaft fractures using intramedullary interlocked nails with and without intramedullary reaming: a preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma 1997;11(2):89-92.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199702000-00003

7. Pape HC, Remmers D, Regel G, Tscherne H. Pulmonale Komplikationen nach intramedullärer Stabilisierung langer Röhrenknochen. Einfluss von Operationsverfahren, -Zeitpunkt und Verletzungsmuster [Pulmonary complications following intramedullary stabilization of long bones. Effect of surgical procedure, time and injury pattern]. Orthopade 1995;24(2):164-72. PMID: 7753541

8. Moed BR, Watson JT. Retrograde intramedullary nailing, without reaming, of fractures of the femoral shaft in
multiply injured patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77(10):1520-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199510000-00006

9. Franklin JL, Winquist RA, Benirschke SK, Hansen ST Jr. Broken intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1988;70(10):1463-71. PMID: 3198670

10. Brewster NT, Ashcroft GP, Scotland TR. Extraction of broken intramedullary nails--an improvement in technique. Injury 1995;26(4):286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)90020-x

11. Hak DJ, McElvany M. Removal of broken hardware. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16(2):113-20.
https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200802000-00009

12. Blake SM. A technique for the removal of the distal part of a broken intramedullary nail. Ann R Coll Surg Engl
2009;91(2):169-70. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2009.91.2.169

13. Magu NK, Sharma AK, Singh R. Extraction of the broken intramedullary femoral nail--an innovative technique.
Injury 2004;35(12):1322-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00314-0

14. Karladani AH. Removal of a broken nail using a guide wire and a screw. Acta Orthop 2006;77(6):986-8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610013330

15. Abdelgawad AA, Kanlic E. Removal of a broken cannulated intramedullary nail: review of the literature and a case report of a new technique. Case Rep Orthop 2013;2013:461703. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/461703

16. Acharya M, Alani A, Almedghio S. The Fish Hook Technique of extracting broken intramedullary nails. Acta
Orthop Belg 2008;74(5):686-8. PMID: 19058706

17. Whalley H, Thomas G, Hull P, Porter K. Surgeon versus metalwork--tips to remove a retained intramedullary nail fragment. Injury 2009;40(7):783-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.009