Comparison of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes between Patients Younger and Older than 55 years

  • Daniel Sebastián Villena Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5742-1226
  • Pablo Sotelano Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-299X
  • Leonardo Conti Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2333-5834
  • Ana Cecilia Parise Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-3693
  • Gala Santini Araujo Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-5827
  • Sofía Carlucci Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8144-3994
  • Carlos Dozo Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-0056
  • Marina Carrasco Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-4936
Keywords: Ankle, arthroplasty, age, ankle arthritis

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic postoperative outcomes in two groups of patients: ≤55 and >55-year patients undergoing a third-generation total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Materials and Methods: Two groups of patients were retrospectively studied: ≤55 (n=13) and >55-year patients (n=19) undergoing a third-generation TAA. Group ≤55 average age was 42.8 (SD, 6.4) and Group >55 average age was 65.7 (SD, 8.8). Results: The average follow-up was 36 months (IQR, 25-60). The main etiology was post-traumatic conditions in both groups. The mean score of the AOFAS scale one year after surgery was 76.69 (IQR, 58-89)in the group ≤55 and 85.22 (IQR, 67-100) in the group >55. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the α, β, and γ angles measured on weight-bearing radiographs at 2-month and 2-year postoperative controls. Conclusions: Our study shows clinical and radiographic short-term outcomes in younger patients are similar to those in older patients. Longer-term follow-up is warranted to determine if the revision risk is greater in young patients, due to failures related to prosthesis wear. Level of Evidence: III

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Sebastián Villena, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Pablo Sotelano, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Leonardo Conti, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Ana Cecilia Parise, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Gala Santini Araujo, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Sofía Carlucci, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Carlos Dozo, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Marina Carrasco, Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Management Sector, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

References

Haddad S, Coetzee J, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total

ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;90:499-505. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.01149

Hintermann B, Valderrabano V. Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 2003;8:357-405.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s1083-7515(03)00015-9

Easley ME, Adams SM, Hembree C, DeOrio JK. Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(15):1455-68. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00126

Bai L, Lee K, Soon E, Yoon T, Seon J. Total ankle arthroplasty outcome comparison for post-traumatic and primary osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int 2010;31:1048-56. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.1048

Raikin S, Rasouli M, Espandar R, Maltenfort M. Trends in treatment of advanced ankle arthropathy by total ankle replacement or ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int 2014;35(3):216-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713517101

Kofoed H, Lundberg-Jensen A. Ankle arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 50 years: a prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20:501-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079902000807

Stauffer R, Segal N. Total ankle arthroplasty: four year experience. Clin Orthop 1981;160:217-21.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198110000-00032

Bolton-Maggs B, Sudlow R, Freeman M. Total ankle arthroplasty: A long-term review of the London Hospital

experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985;67:785-90. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.67b5.4055882

Kitaoka H, Patzer G. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1658-64.

https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199611000-00004

Buechel F, Pappas M. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: Biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 1980;8:279-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078800800603

Lee KB, Cho SG, Hur CI, Yoon TR. Perioperative complications of Hintegra total ankle replacement: our initial 50 cases. Foot Ankle Int 2008;29(10):978-84. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2008.0978

Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W. The HINTEGRA Ankle: Rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;424:57-68. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000132462.72843.e8

Barg A, Knupp M, Henninger HB, Zwicky L, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement using HINTEGRA, an

unconstrained, three-component system. Foot Ankle Clin 2012;17(4):607-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2012.08.006

Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adalaar RS, Nunley J, Myerson M, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle,

hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:349-53.

https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079701800315

Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A. The Swedish Ankle Arthroplasty Register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties

between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007;78(5):569-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710014248

Spirt A, Assal M, Sigvard T, Hansen J. Complication and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86(6):1172-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200406000-00008

Hakon K, Lundberg-Jensen A. Ankle arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 50 years: A prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20(8):501-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079902000807

Tenenbaum S, Bariteau J, Coleman S, Brodsky J. Functional and clinical outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in

elderly compared to younger patients. Foot Ankle Surg 2017;23(2):102-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2016.09.005

Henn R, Ghomrawi H, Rutledge J, Mazumdar M, Mancuso C, Marx R. Preoperative patient expectations of total

shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(22):2110-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhls.2012.05.018

Mancuso C, Salvati E, Johanson N, Petersen M, Charlson M, Patients expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(4):387-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90194-7

Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average follow-up of 65 patients. Clin Orthop 2004;(424):47-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000132245.18548.09

Wood PLR, Prem H, Sutton C. Total ankle replacement: medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle

replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(5):605-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19677

Fevang BTS, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Brun JG, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O. 257 ankle arthroplasties performed in

Norway between 1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop 2007;78(5):575-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710014257

Stengel D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkmap A, Cramer J. Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing

devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125(2):109-19.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0765-3

Demetracopoulos CA, Adams SB, Queen RM, De Orio JK, Nunley JA, Easley ME. Effect of age on outcomes in

total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 2015 36(8):871-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715579717

Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, Amendola A, Anderson RB, Bertel GC, et al. Prospective controlled trial of

STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int 2009;30(7):579-96.

https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2009.0579

Saltzman CL, Zimmerman MB, O’Rourke M, Brown TD, Buckwalter JA, Johnston R. Impact of comorbidities on

the measurement of health in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(11):2366-72.

https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.00295

Choi, WJ, Lee, JW. Heterotopic ossification after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:1508-12.

https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.27641

Koivu H, Kohonen I, Sipola E, Alanen K, Vahlberg T, Tiusanen H. Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the ankle evolutive system total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(7):907-14.

https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b7.22434

Published
2020-11-18
How to Cite
Villena, D. S., Sotelano, P., Conti, L., Parise, A. C., Santini Araujo, G., Carlucci, S., Dozo, C., & Carrasco, M. (2020). Comparison of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes between Patients Younger and Older than 55 years. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 85(4), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2020.85.4.1001
Section
Clinical Research