Impacted­ bone ­allografts ­and­ trabecular­ metal ­cups­ in ­severe acetabular ­bone ­defects:­ 2 ­to ­4 year ­results

Main Article Content

Martín Buttaro
Julián Ali
Fernando Comba
Adrián Sirio
Gerardo Zanotti
Francisco Piccaluga

Abstract

Background: Although trabecular metal cups have been widely used with excellent survival rates at short to intermediate term follow-up, the literature combining these devices with impacted bone allografts is scarce. We evaluated early results of trabecular metal components and bone reconstruction with impaction grafting techniques in acetabular revisions associated with major bone loss. We also compared these results with our previous procedures using reconstruction rings and impaction grafting in similar bone deficiencies.Methods: Twenty cases presenting Paprosky type 3A or 3B mechanical or septic defects in 19 patients with an average age of 65 years were prospectively followed. The preoperative functional score according to Merle D’Aubigne scale was 6.2 points. All the cases were reconstructed with impacted bone allografts and trabecular metal cups.Results: At an average follow-up of 30 months (range 24-48), the survival rate of the acetabular component was 95% (CI = 75-98%). One patient treated with a two-staged protocol presented a septic failure 16 weeks after reimplantation and he was treated with a resection arthroplasty. The average postoperative functional score was 16.2 points. Bone allograft incorporation was observed in all cases, except the infected failure. The comparison with the historic controls using reconstruction rings was highly favorable for the trabecular metal cups.Conclusions: Impaction allografting and trabecular metal cups are a valid alternative in acetabular revision surgery presenting severe bone defects. This method is associated with better results compared to the previously obtained with bone allograft and reconstruction rings.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Buttaro, M., Ali, J., Comba, F., Sirio, A., Zanotti, G., & Piccaluga, F. (2014). Impacted­ bone ­allografts ­and­ trabecular­ metal ­cups­ in ­severe acetabular ­bone ­defects:­ 2 ­to ­4 year ­results. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 79(2), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.15417/298
Section
Clinical Research
Author Biography

Martín Buttaro, Centro de Cadera, Instituto de Ortopedia y Traumatología "Carlos E. Ottolenghi" Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.

Medico de planta, Centro de Cadera "Sir John Charnley"Servicio de Ortopedia y Traumatología "Carlos E. Ottolenghi"Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

References

1. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty.
A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:33.

2. D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;243:126-34.

3. Duffy GP, O´Connor MI, Brodersen MP. Fatigue failure of the GAP ring. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:711-4.

4. Buttaro M, Nunez L, Lopez Ovenza J, Comba F, Piccaluga F. Falla mecánica precoz de un anillo de reconstrucción acetabular
tipo Kerboull. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2008;73:285-9.

5. Buttaro M, Munoz de la Rosa D, Comba F, Piccaluga F. High failure rate with the Gap II ring and impacted allograft bone in
severe acetabular defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(11):3148-55.

6. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a
new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81(5):907-14.

7. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe
acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl 2):83.

8. Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, Nelson CL, Garino JP. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and
augments. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(Suppl):64-8.

9. Ballester Alfaro JJ, Sueiro Fernandez J. Trabecular metal buttress augment and the trabecular metal cup-cage construct in
revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Hip Int 2010;27(Suppl. 7):119-27.

10. Skytta ET, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen PO, Remes VM. Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision.
J Arthroplasty 2011;26(3):342-5.

11. Davies JH, Laflamme GY, Delisle J, Fernandes J. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.
J Arthroplasty 2011;26(8):1245-50.

12. Sternheim A, Backstein D, Kuzyk PR, Goshua G, Berkovich Y, Safir O, et al. Porous metal revision shells for management of
contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years: a comparison between up to 50% bleeding host bone contact
and more than 50% contact. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94(2):158-62.

13. Merle d’Aubigné R. Cotation chiffreé de la fonction de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Moteur 1970;56:481-6.

14. Nunez L, Buttaro M, Morandi A, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. The value of intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision hip
surgery. Acta Orthop 2007;78:226-30.

15. Buttaro M, Comba F, Piccaluga F. Vancomycin-supplemented cancellous bone allografts in hip revision surgery. Clin Orthop
Relat Res 2007;461:74-80.

16. Slooff TJ, Schimmel JW, Buma P. Cemented fixation with bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:667-77.

17. Böhm P, Banzhaf S. Acetabular revision with allograft bone. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70(3):240-9.

18. Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross AE. Revision total hip arthroplasty with shelf bulk allografts. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:86-90.
Año 79 • Número 2 • 2014 Copas de metal trabecular y aloinjertos óseos impactados en defectos acetabulares graves 91

19. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976;121:20-32.

20. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-81.

21. Dearborn JT, Harris WH. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year
follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:8-15.

22. Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented
cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466(10):2482-90.

23. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC, Kent GM. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile
strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth. Clin Orthop 1980;149:291-8.

24. van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular
defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:296-300.

25. Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using
cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2007;93(3):255-63.

26. Rudelli S, Honda E, Viriato SP, Libano G, Leite LF. Acetabular revision with bone graft and cementless cup. J Arthroplasty
2009;24(3):432-43.

27. Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;378:155-68.

28. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z. Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction.
J Arthroplasty 2001;16:961-9.

29. Lunn JV, Kearns SS, Quinlan W, Murray P, O’Byrne J. Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement
device 35 hips followed for 3-7 years. Acta Orthop 2005;76:296-302.

30. Sembrano JN, Cheng EY. Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res
2008;466:1657-65.

Most read articles by the same author(s)