Use of dual mobility acetabular cups for isolated femoral revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty using larger femoral heads.
Article Sidebar
PDF (Español (España))
PDF
BIBLIOGRAFIA (Español (España))
FIG 1 (Español (España))
FIG 1 TEXTO (Español (España))
FIG 2a (Español (España))
FIG 2a Txt (Español (España))
FIG 2b (Español (España))
FIG 2 c (Español (España))
FIG. 2 d (Español (España))
FIG. 3 (Español (España))
FIG. 3 Txt (Español (España))
FIG 4 a (Español (España))
FIG 4 b (Español (España))
FIG 4 txt (Español (España))
FIG. 5 (Español (España))
FIG 5 Txt (Español (España))
resumen con datos (Español (España))
Published:
Feb 20, 2019
Keywords:
Dual mobility cups, resurfacing hip revision, metal on metal hip arthroplasty
Main Article Content
Abstract
Large head metal on metal hip arthroplasty revision has a significant complication rate, mainly related to the removal of the acetabular component, as well as to the friction pair used. In some cases, an isolated femoral revision can be made, sparing the acetabular cup and, thus, decreasing surgical morbidity.This paper discusses a case successfully treated with a dual mobility acetabular cup in a patient with a resurfacing hip replacement and a pseudotumor that caused pain and instability.Mastering this surgical approach allows hip surgeons to solve complex problems in a simple and safe manner, and with a low complication rate.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Valdez, S. E. (2019). Use of dual mobility acetabular cups for isolated femoral revision of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty using larger femoral heads. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 84(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2019.84.1.741
Issue
Section
Case Presentations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
References
1. Snir N, Park BK, Garofalo G, Marwin SE. Revision of failed hip resurfacing and large metal no metal total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility components. Orthopedics 2015;38(6):369-74.
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150603-04
2. Grammatoupolos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM. Hip resurfacing revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcame. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(8):1019-24. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22562
3. Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Lewanllen DG. Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(9):2313-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1419-0
4. Su EP, Su SL. Surface replacement conversion: results depend upon reason for revision. Bone Joint J 2013;95(11 Suppl A):88-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32663
5. Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Dunlop DJ. Revision of metal and metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes. Hip Int 2014;24:311-320. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000140
6. Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH. Low rate of dislocation of dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(12):3891-900. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2929-3
7. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillte C, Bejui-Hegues J. Use a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(2):465-72. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0
8. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 8th Annual Report 2011. Hertforshire, United Kingdom: National Joint Registry for England and Wales; 2011. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/portals/0/documents/njr%208th%20annual%20report%202011.pdf
9. Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ. Metal on metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:572-79.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26429
10. De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulus G. Revisions of metal on metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 2011;42(2):259-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.01.003
11. Rajpura A, Porter ML, Gambhir AK, Freemont AJ, Board TN. Clinical experience of revisions of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL). Hip Int 2011;21:43-51. DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2011.6276
12. Pritchett JW. Once component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:219-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.011
13. Verhelst LA, Van der Bracht H, Vanhegan IS, Van Backlé B, De Schepper J. Revising the well fixed, painful resurfacing using a double mobility head: a new strategy to address metal on metal complications. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(10):1857-62.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.012
14. Plummer DR, Botero HG, Berend KR. Salvage of monoblock metal on metal acetabular components using a dual mobility bearing. J Arthroplasty 2016;31(4):846-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.016
15. Figueras G, Planell RV, Serra Fernandez R, Biayna JC. Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty with well fixed and positioned acetabular component using a dual- mobility head and review of literature. Open Orthop J 2016;10:512-21.
DOI: 10.2174/1874325001610010512
16. Sassoon AA, Barrack RL. Pseudotumour formation and subsequent resolution in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty following revision. Bone Joint J Br 2016;98(6):736-40.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36908
17. Valdez S, Bouxin B. Cotilos con doble movilidad: principios, ventajas y resultados. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2009;74:102-10. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.phpscript=sci_arttext&pid=S1852-74342009000100016
18. Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B. Is cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(11):3048-53. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2395-3
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150603-04
2. Grammatoupolos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM. Hip resurfacing revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcame. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(8):1019-24. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22562
3. Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Lewanllen DG. Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(9):2313-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1419-0
4. Su EP, Su SL. Surface replacement conversion: results depend upon reason for revision. Bone Joint J 2013;95(11 Suppl A):88-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32663
5. Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Dunlop DJ. Revision of metal and metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes. Hip Int 2014;24:311-320. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000140
6. Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH. Low rate of dislocation of dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(12):3891-900. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2929-3
7. Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillte C, Bejui-Hegues J. Use a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(2):465-72. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0
8. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 8th Annual Report 2011. Hertforshire, United Kingdom: National Joint Registry for England and Wales; 2011. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/portals/0/documents/njr%208th%20annual%20report%202011.pdf
9. Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ. Metal on metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:572-79.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26429
10. De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulus G. Revisions of metal on metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 2011;42(2):259-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.01.003
11. Rajpura A, Porter ML, Gambhir AK, Freemont AJ, Board TN. Clinical experience of revisions of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL). Hip Int 2011;21:43-51. DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2011.6276
12. Pritchett JW. Once component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:219-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.011
13. Verhelst LA, Van der Bracht H, Vanhegan IS, Van Backlé B, De Schepper J. Revising the well fixed, painful resurfacing using a double mobility head: a new strategy to address metal on metal complications. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(10):1857-62.
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.05.012
14. Plummer DR, Botero HG, Berend KR. Salvage of monoblock metal on metal acetabular components using a dual mobility bearing. J Arthroplasty 2016;31(4):846-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.016
15. Figueras G, Planell RV, Serra Fernandez R, Biayna JC. Revision of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty with well fixed and positioned acetabular component using a dual- mobility head and review of literature. Open Orthop J 2016;10:512-21.
DOI: 10.2174/1874325001610010512
16. Sassoon AA, Barrack RL. Pseudotumour formation and subsequent resolution in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty following revision. Bone Joint J Br 2016;98(6):736-40.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36908
17. Valdez S, Bouxin B. Cotilos con doble movilidad: principios, ventajas y resultados. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2009;74:102-10. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.phpscript=sci_arttext&pid=S1852-74342009000100016
18. Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B. Is cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(11):3048-53. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2395-3