Vascularized bone graft of the distal radius for recalcitrant ulnar pseudoarthrosis.
Abstract
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients treated with the pedicled distal radius vascularized bone graft (VBG) for recalcitrant ulnar nonunions.MethodsA retrospective study was perfomed. The inclusion criteria were patients with diaphyseal or proximal ulnar nonunions with bone defects smaller than 6 centimeters, at least three previous surgeries and a minimum follow-up of 2 years treated with pedicled VBG of the distal radius. The number of previous surgeries was recorded. The elbow and wrist range of motion, the comparative grip strength, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, the QuickDASH questionnaire and the Mayo Score for elbow were evaluated. ResultsSeven patients were included. The mean age was 42 years (range 26-64). The average number of previous surgeries was 4 (3-7). The mean follow-up was 21 months (range 24-36). All pseudoarthrosis consolidated. The Mayo score was good in 4 patients, excellent in 2 patients and moderate in one patient. The mean postoperative QuickDASH was 13 (0-29). The flexion-extension arch of the wrist was 81% of the contralateral. The elbow range of motion was > 100° in 5 patients and 50°- 100° in 2 patients.ConclusionThe pedicled vascularized bone graft of the distal radius is an effective alternative for the treatment of recalcitrant ulnar nonunions.Downloads
References
Ring D, Allende C, Jafarnia K, Allende BT, Jupiter JB. Ununited diaphyseal forearm fractures with segmental defects: plate fixation and autogenous cancellous bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004; 86:2440–2445.
Ring D, Jupiter JB, Gulotta L. Atrophic nonunions of the proximal ulna. Clin Orthop. 2003; 409:268–274.
Jupiter JB, Gerhard HJ, Guerrero J, Nunley JA, Levin LS. Treatment
of segmental defects of the radius with use of the vascularized
osteoseptocutaneous fibular autogenous graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
;79(4):542–550.
Pinal FD, García-Bernal FD, Regalado J, Ayala H, Cagigal L, Studer
A. Vascularised corticoperiosteal grafts from the medial femoral
condyle for difficult non-unions of the upper limb. J Hand Surg Eur
Vol. 2007;32(2):135–142.
Zaidenberg CR. Seudoartrosis recalcitrante del húmero distal: injerto óseo vascularizado del radio distal. Nueva técnica quirúrgica. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol. Año 73, pp. 6-12.
Mullett H, Hausman M, Zaidemberg C. Recalcitrant distal humeral and proximal forearm nonunion: salvage using an extended pedicled radial forearm osseous flap. J Trauma. 2008; 64:60–64.
Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:479-90.
Micev AJ, Kalainov DM, Soneru AP. Masquelet technique for treatment of segmental bone loss in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40(3):593-598.
Davis JA, Choo A, O’Connor DP, Brinker MR. Treatment of infected forearm nonunions with large complete segmental defects using bulk allograft and intramedullary fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 2016, 41 (9): 881-
Julka A, Ozer K. Infected nonunion of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg AM. 2013, 38 (11): 2244-6.
Wood MB, Bishop AT. Massive bone defects of the upper limb:
reconstruction by vascularized bone transfer. Hand Clin. 2007;23(1):
-56.
Ring D, Jupiter JB. Wave plate osteosynthesis in the upper extremity.
Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 1997;1(3):168 –174.
Esser RD. Treatment of a bone defect of the forearm by bone
transport. A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;326:221–224.
del Piñal F, Innocenti M. Evolving concepts in the management of the bone gap in the upper limb. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(7):776-92
Adani R, Delcroix L, Innocenti M, et al. Reconstruction of large posttraumatic skeletal defects of the forearm by vascularized free fibular graft. Microsurgery. 2004;24(6):423– 429.
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house. The RAAOT is under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
In the event that the manuscript is approved for its next publication, the authors retain the copyright and will assign to the journal the rights of publication, edition, reproduction, distribution, exhibition and communication at a national and international level in the different databases. data, repositories and portals.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.


