Cerclage Wiring in Subtrochanteric Hip Fractures. Analysis of Benefits and Complications

Keywords: Subtrochanteric fracture, cerclage wire, union, nonunion, infection, malalignment

Abstract

Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether open reduction with cerclage wire affected the union and/or complication rate in subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails. Materials and Methods: We analyzed all patients who had undergone surgery in our center between January 2010 and December 2017. We comparatively analyzed those treated with (Group A) and without (Group B) cerclage wire in terms of fracture type, hospital stay, surgical time, blood transfusions, malalignment, union, and complications (infection rates, non-union, and reoperations). Results: Fifty-eight patients were included. Group A consisted of 20 patients and Group B of 38. The most frequent type of fracture was 3A (p 0.0004). The mean hospital stay was similar (9 vs 10.6 days p 0.81), the surgical time and transfusions were higher in group A (p<0.0001 and p 0.58 respectively). The union rate was similar (90 vs 92.1%;p 0.09, respectively). Malalignment was only observed in group B (5 - 13.5%; p 0.01). Thecomplication (15 vs 18.4%) and reoperation (15 vs 15.8%) rates were similar (p 0.99). Conclusions: The use of cerclage wire in subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails generated a significant increase in surgical time and a lower rate of malalignment. It allowed a lower rate of re-operation, although it was not significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Germán Garabano, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Alan Gessara, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joaquín Rodríguez, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Tamara Dainotto, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Hernán del Sel, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

References

Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K, Hutchinson JD, Gregori A. Gender difference in epidemiology and outcomes after hip fracture: evidence from the Scottish hip fracture adult. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(4):480-3.

https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20264

Barbosa de Toledo PR, Pires RES. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: update. Rev Bras Ortop 2016;51(3):246-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.03.001

Karayiannis P, James A. The impact of cerclage cabling on unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fracture: a retrospective review of 465 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020;46(5):969-75.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-01071-4

Afsari A, Liporace F, Lindvall E, Infante A, Sagi HC, Haidukewych GJ. Clamp-assisted reduction of high

subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(8):1913-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01563

Robinet JM, Torres M, Moreno MB, Alonso JA, García SG. Minimally invasive clamp-assisted reduction and

cephalomedullary nailing without cerclage cables for subtrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: surgical

technique and results. Injury 2015;46(6):1036-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.0119

Pesciallo C, Mana DP, Barrios JM, del Sel H. Fracturas subtrocantereas de fémur. Tratamiento con clavo de fémur proximal por técnica mínimamente invasiva. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2009;74(1):13-9. Disponible en: https://www.aaot.org.ar/revista/2009/n1/art03.pdf

Rhie JT, Widmaier JC. Technique of obtaining and maintaining reduction during nailing of femur fractures.

Orthopedics 2009;32(8):581-8. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090624-17

Appivatthakakul T, Phaliphot J, Leuvitoonvechkit S. Percutaneous cerclage wiring, does it disrupt femoral blood

supply? A cadaveric injection study. Injury 2013;44(2):168-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.016

Perren SM. Evolution of internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(8):1093-110. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13752

Vaidya SV, Dholakia DB, Chatterjee A. The use of dynamic condylar screw and biological reduction techniques for subtrochanteric femur fracture. Injury 2003;34(2):123-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00319-4

Celebi L, Can M, Muratli HH, Yagmurlu MF, Yuksel HY, Sicimoglu AN. Indirect reduction and biological internal

fixation of comminuted subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Injury 2006;37(8):740-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.12.022

Seinsheimer F. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:300-6. PMID: 649632

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1058-64.

https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012

Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51(4):737-55. PMID: 5783851

Trikha V, Saudhik D, Prabhat A, Arkesh M, Sunil KD. Role of percutaneous cerclage wire in the management of

subtrochanteric fractures treated with intramedullary nails. Chin J Traumat 2018;21(1):42-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.01.001

Tomas J, Teixidor J, Batalla L, Pacha D, Cortina J. Subtrochanteric fractures: treatment with cerclage wire and long intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 2013;27:e157-160. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826fc03f

Finsen V. The effect of cerclage wires on the strength of diaphyseal bone. Injury 1995;26(3):159-61.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)93493-2

Muller T, Topp T, Kuhne CA, Gebhart G, Ruchholtz S, Zetti ARE. The benefit of wire cerclage stabilization of the

medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 2011;35(8):1237-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1204-4

Starr AJ, Hay MT, Reinert CM, Borer DS, Christensen KC. Cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of high-energy proximal femur fractures in young patients: a prospective, randomized comparison of trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry portal. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20(4):240-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-20060400-00002

Shukla S, Johnston P, Ahmad MA, Wynn-Jones H, Patel AD, Walton NP. Outcome of traumatic subtrochanteric

femoral fractures fixed using cephalomedullary nails. Injury 2007;38(11):1286-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.05.013

Kennedy MT, Mitra A, Hierlihy TG, Harty JA, Reidy D, Dolan M. Subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with cerclage cables and long cephalomedullary nails: a review of 17 consecutive cases over 2 years. Injury 2011;42(11):1317-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.023

Malik MHA, Harwood P, Diggle P, Khan SA. Factors affecting rate of infection and nonunion in intramedullary

nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86(4):556-60. PMID: 15174553

Krappinger D, Wolf B, Dammerer D, Thaler M, Schwendinger P, Lindtner RA. Risk factors for nonunion after

intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019;139(6):769-77.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03131-9

Edwards C, Counsell A, Boulton C, Moran CG. Early infection after hip fracture surgery: risk factors, cost and

outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90(6):770-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20194

Pazzaglia UE, Coniu T, Raspanti M, Ranchetti F, Quacci D. Anatomy of the intracortical canal system. Scanning

electron microscopy study inrabbit femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(9):2446-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0806-x

Published
2022-04-18
How to Cite
Garabano, G., Gessara, A., Rodríguez, J., Dainotto, T., & del Sel, H. (2022). Cerclage Wiring in Subtrochanteric Hip Fractures. Analysis of Benefits and Complications. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 87(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.2.1400