Longitudinal postnatal growth of the first metatarsal bone

Main Article Content

Julio J. Masquijo
Victoria Allende
Luis M. Herrera
Armando Torres Gómez

Abstract

Background: while prenatal and postnatal growth of the foot has been documented several years ago, longitudinal growth of the first metatarsal has not been previously evaluated. The aim of the study is to determine the postnatal longitudinal growth pattern of this bone and compare it with the foot and lower limb long bones.Methods: through a computerized image search, we identified patients <18 years old with radiographs reported as “normal” by the radiologist. A sample of 886 patients was divided into 18 groups according to age (0-11 months, 1 year, 2 years, etc.) and sex. Analysis was performed using Kodak Carestream imaging software PACS.Results: the average length in the first group was 19.91 mm (3.20, 15.22-25.62). The average length in the last group was 66.13 mm (5.33, 52.50-77.18). Annual growth rate was 2.71 mm. The average age at the time of physeal closure was 14.85 years (± 1.64) for boys and 14.77 years (± 3.63) for girls.Conclusion: longitudinal growth of the first metatarsal mimics the growth of foot but not that of the long bones of the lower limb. Growth curves described in this article can be applied to conditions that affect foot development or require corrective surgery on the first metatarsal, as well as a standard reference in future studies.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Masquijo, J. J., Allende, V., Herrera, L. M., & Torres Gómez, A. (2014). Longitudinal postnatal growth of the first metatarsal bone. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 79(4), 218-223. https://doi.org/10.15417/345
Section
Clinical Research

References

1. Standring S, Gray H. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th ed. New York, NY: Churchill-Livingstone;
2009.

2. Roche AF. The sites of elongation of human metacarpals and metatarsals. Acta Anat 1965;61:193-202.

3. Pyle I, Sontag LW. Variability in onset of ossification in epiphyses and short bones of the extremities. Am J Roentgenol
1943;49:795-8.

4. Holden D, Siff S, Butler J, Cain T. Shortening of the first metatarsal as a complication of metatarsal osteotomies. J Bone Joint
Surg Am 1984;66(4):582-7.

5. Gardner E, Gray DJ, O’Rahilly R. The prenatal development of the skeleton and joints of the human foot. J Bone Joint Surg
Am 1959;41:847-76.

6. Anderson M, Blais MM, Green WT. Lengths of the growing foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1956;38:998-1000.

7. Anderson M, Green WT. Lengths of the femur and the tibia; norms derived from orthoroentgenograms of children from 5 years
of age until epiphysial closure. Am J Dis Child 1948;75:279-90.

8. Anderson M, Blais M, Green WT. Growth of the normal foot during childhood and adolescence; length of the foot and
interrelations of foot, stature, and lower extremity as seen in serialrecords of children between 1–18 years of age. Am J Phys
Anthropol 1956;14:287-308.

9. Lamm BM, Paley D, Kurland DB, Matz AL, Herzenberg JE. Multiplier method for predicting adult foot length. J Pediatr
Orthop 2006;26(4):444-8.

10. McGraw MA, Mehlman CT, Lindsell CJ, Kirby CL. Postnatal growth of the clavicle: birth to eighteen years of age. J Pediatr
Orthop 2009;29(8):937-43.

11. Parikh SN, Weesner M, Welge J. Postnatal growth of the calcaneus does not simulate growth of the foot. J Pediatr Orthop
2012;32(1):93-9.

12. de Vasconcellos HA, Prates JC, Moraes LG, Rodriques HC. Growth of the human metatarsal bones in the fetal period (13-24
weeks postconception): a quantitative study. Surg Radiol Ana. 1992;14(4):315-8.

13. Simons GWA. Standardized method for the radiographic evaluation of clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;135:107-18.

Most read articles by the same author(s)