Intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fracture

Main Article Content

Jorge Chahla
Gustavo Gomez Rodriguez

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the results obtained with intramedullary nailing in patients with fracture of the distal third of the tibia.Methods The inclusion criteria of this study were skeletally mature patients with displaced fractures of the distal tibia treated with intramedullary nail with a minimum follow up of one year. Gustilo III open fractures and type C fractures of the AO classification (complete articular Stroke) were excluded. The sample comprised 35 patients remained. The follow-up was 29.2 months. We evaluated the time of consolidation, malunion and complications. The functional results were described according to the AOFAS score. Results Of the 35 patients with fracture of the distal third of the tibia all of them presented fracture healing. The average time to union was 17.2 weeks (range: 11-26). Of the total sample, 5 patients had delayed union, requiring dynamic nail on average at 12 weeks. The malunion was present in 4 (11.4%) patients. We found no  difference (p = 0.201) in the time to union between fractures associated with fractures of the fibula treated (13sem) or not (17sem). The AOFAS score was 86 points. Conclusion Intramedullary nailing with multiple distal locks like a good alternative treatment for distal tibia fractures AO type A or B, with low complication rate and a high rate of consolidation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Arroquy, D., Chahla, J., Gomez Rodriguez, G., Cid Casteulani, A., Svarzchtein, S., Gomez, D., & Pesciallo, C. (2015). Intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fracture. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 80(4), 266-273. https://doi.org/10.15417/486
Section
Clinical Research
Author Biography

Jorge Chahla, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires

Médico residente.

References

1. Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A, Berrichi A, Labatut L, Simon P, et al. Distal tibia fractures: management and complication of 101 cases. Int Orthop 2010;34:583-8.

2. Lee YS, Chen SW, Chen SH, Chen WC, Lau MJ, Hsu TL. Stabilisation of the fractured fibula plays an important role in the treatment of pilon fractures: a retrospective comparison of fibular fixation methods. Int Orthop 2008;33: 695-9.

3. Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown C (eds.) Rockwood & Green’s: Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

4. Topliss CJ, Jackson M, Atkins RM. Anatomy of pilon fractures of the distal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:692-7.

5. Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM. Interlocking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:640-6.

6. Collinge C, Kuper M, Larson K, Protzman R. Minimally invasive plating of high-energy metaphysial distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:355-61.

7. Nork SE, Shwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA.
Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1213-21.

8. Sarmiento A, Sharpe FE, Ebramzadeh E, Normand P, Shankwiler J. Factors influencing the outcome of closed tibial fractures treated with functional bracing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;315:8-24.

9. Sheerin DV, Turen CH, Nascone JW. Reconstruction of distal tibia fractures using a posterolateral approach and a blade plate. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:247-52.

10. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453-8.

11. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunly JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle, hind foot, mid foot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:349-53.

12. Court-Brown CM, MC Birnie J. The epidemiology of tibia fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:417-21.

13. White RR, Babikian GM. Tibia shaft. En: Ruedi TP, Murphy WM (eds.) AO Principles of Fracture Management. Stuttgard: Thieme; 2000:519-36.

14. Yaligod V, Rudrappa GH, Nagendra S, Shivanna UM. Minimizing the complications of intramedullary nailing for distal third tibial shaft and metaphyseal fractures. J Orthop 2013;11(1):10-8.

15. Janssen KW, Biert J, Kampen A. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail. A retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop 2007;31:709-14.

16. Ruedi T, Allgower M. Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle joint. Injury 1969;1:92-9.

17. Buzzi R, Bertini A, Cecchi F, Giron F. Distal tibial-fibular fractures: treatment with fibular fixation and locked intramedullary nailing. J Orthop 2009;1:33-40.

18. Kumar A, Charlebois SJ, Cain EL, Smith RA, Daniels AU, Crate JM. Effect of fibular plate fixation on rotational stability of simulated distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:604-8.

19. Teitz CC, Carter DR, Frankel VH. Problems associated with tibial fractures with intact fibulae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:770-6.

20. Rouhani A, Elmi A, Akbari Aghdam H, Panahi F, Dokht Ghafari Y. The role of fibular fixation in the treatment of tibia diaphysis distal third fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98:868-72.

21. Whittle AP. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 11th ed., Philadelphia: Mosby; 2008; vol. 3, p. 3122.